Parks Victoria banner

This new facility is a combined office and depot in the unique setting of Melbourne’s Albert Park. The park has a layered history and a complex current pattern of use, with the Grand Prix taking over much of it each year.

We sought to understand this condition and learn how Parks Victoria works day to day, to then design a combined office and depot facility that services the both park and wider region.

Given the highly visible nature of the selection site, the building is approached from multiple directions and this is reflected in the design. Fence lines, gates and hardstand areas are all design driven to avoid the sense of a back of house facility.

Our initial proposal for the site was to merge two separate elements of the brief – the office and the depot, into a single building – this was to enable greater integration between depot and office staff, and to reduce the overall footprint in the park. This proposal was adopted by the client group as a positive evolution of the brief.

The project was well procured – a three stage process, (starting with an open EOI) by the appointed project manager lead to our team being selected.

The consultant team we developed was a dynamic design-focused collaboration with design disciplines with supporting engineers. We delivered this project in joint venture with Harrison and White, and Accuraco Project Management and Openwork landscape architecture formed the core team.

Wood and Grieve providing general structural and services engineering. Global Consulting Engineering provided specialist CLT advice and certification.

The project represents value for money, with a modest budget given the level of finish, complex site conditions, extensive landscape works and non-standard structural system.

The building presents excellence in sustainability, integrating building and landscape – green spaces are used to shade, cool and activate the building, and the project has at is heart a central courtyard space. This brings landscape into the centre, acting as a source of ventilation and light the central courtyard is also a space for gathering and mixing. The upper level is a donut of space screened with vegetation of varied species for different orientations.

The project improves and re-activates this corner of the park – replacing an underused building and improving the surrounding landscape and adding passive surveillance to this area of the park. The project seeks to remain public despite the secure depot functions. Members of the public can walk into the heart of the building, the main courtyard, which we conceptualised as the park. The perimeter of the building features an in-situ concrete seat, in the tradition of park benches, and this was include as a public offering, to imagine the building as a piece of familiar park infrastructure.

Location
: Albert Park, VIC

Builder: Building Engineering

Construction: CLT

Size: 800m2

Completed: 2019

Photography: Peter Bennetts

Awards: National Commendation / Public Architecture / National Architecture Awards. Winner / Public Architecture / Victorian Architecture Awards. Winner / Commercial / ArchiTeam Awards. Winner / Award for Excellence / Interior - Non Residential / Design & Development Awards.

Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria
Parks Victoria

Professionals used in
Parks Victoria

About the
Professional

Archier creates engaging architectural spaces and bespoke products, with an emphasis on honest, responsive design and efficient construction.

ARCHIER is an architectural practice with studios in Hobart and Melbourne. We work across residential and commercial sectors and have a particular interest in the relationship between architecture and landscape. We are a privately owned company and have four principals. One of our four directors is also Landscape Architect and this gives us a unique skill-set to work seamlessly across the two domains of Architecture and Landscape.

We work across a range of scales; for a range of clients. Our work encompasses residential, commercial and government architecture; public and private landscape projects; as well as the design and manufacture of furniture and lighting products

Our innovative designs are focused on material honesty, thermal performance and constructability, as we strive for affordable and responsive architecture that contributes to the public domain.

We are interested in projects that span architecture, urban design and landscape and embrace the mantra that design is delivery. Our practice utilises BIM extensively to automate and streamline our design work-flow and we are increasingly leveraging BIM to not only aid and support the delivery and construction of our work; we are also using it directly with Off Site Manufacturers to automate the production of timber based floor, wall and roof elements directly from the coordinated design model.

Our directors have over 25 years of combined industry experience and were drawn together to create an inclusive practice that is truly outcome orientated. We have won awards across a range of disciplines connected to the built environment that recognise our design excellence and innovation, along with our commitment to sustainable buildings and the environment.

As a practice, we have worked on large scale commercial projects with a construction value in excess of $100M through Joint Venture arrangements with Hayball Architects and we have lead multidisciplinary teams for complex commercial projects over $5M in value.

We relish the opportunity to work collaboratively with clients and large project teams to incorporate specialist knowledge and expertise into our work. We are data driven and focused on quality project outcomes. We have proven project experience leading complex projects in sensitive environments and have been recognised for our contextual approach to design.

We have also been awarded for our approach to sustainability and always seek not only to optimise the thermal performance of our buildings, but also to consider the life cycle cost of our material choices.